Tuesday 31 August 2010

Yves Marchand and Romain Meffre



Marchand and Meffre are two Parisian photographers who have an insatiable desire to document the deterioration and decay of derelict buildings of the 21st century, whether industrial factories or the multitude of theatres and cinemas which sprung up in 1940's America, these modern ruins are testament to the ephemeral nature of the 21st century.

"Ruins are the visible symbols and landmarks of our societies and their changes, small pieces of history in suspension."

Saturday 28 August 2010

Exhibition of the Summer - Johan Grimonprez


The Belgian born artist Johann Grimonprez occupied the fruitmarket gallery between the 22nd May to 11th July 2010, showing a retrospective of his films from Dial a H.I.S.T.O.R.Y, the film which brought him to prominence through it’s eerily prophetic allusions to 9/11, to Double Take his latest venture, a gripping narrative which explores binary opposites and their inevitable/necessary existence.

Grimonprez’s aesthetic, comprises a conglomeration of archive footage and film clips, interspersed with advertisements, resulting in a narrative, which engenders the equivalent of collage for time-based media.

Although all his films are interesting, it is Double Take which was the show-stopper for me.

His effortless combination of archive footage of the cold war years in which America and Russia are presented as an analogy of Hitchcock and his double and film clips from Hitchcock’s the Birds, question the substantiality of documentary as fact. Instead through the fictional film clips, Grimonprez undermines the supposedly factual news clips, illustrating the theatricality of television and reminding us that what we in fact accept to be truth is far from neutral.

Grimonprez preoccupation with doppelganger illustrated in the very title of the work (Double Take), uses the fictional narrative of Hitchcock meeting his double, to illustrate the threat that one feels from ‘the Other’, whether personally or politically. This is chillingly brought to the fore with the quote “if you meet your double, you should kill him, before he kills you” an idiom that wonderfully expresses the commodity of fear conjured up by the media and popular culture.

In a historical context, Grimonprez cleverly sums up the binary opposites of America and Russia, through their disparate powers, expressed through the triumph of commodity in the consumer culture of America demonstrated through the repeated coffee commercials and Russia's triumphs in science, most notably sputnik, the ‘space race’ and nuclear warheads, alluded to through clips from Hitchcock’s the birds, which suggest fear from above.

All in all through Grimonprez’s myriad of references he creates a rich and complex work, that not only questions the documentary medium itself, but through archival footage of the cold war, expresses the fact that existence does not consist of one unified reality but rather multiple realities, a point which is enforced by the suggestion that television, specifically news clips are a product of the nation in which they are aired. Grimonprez’s films are intellectually challenging, however the result is a work that is conceptually outstanding and encourages the viewer to question his own perception of the world.

As part of its educational programme, the Fruitmarket gallery organised a series of talks surrounding Grimonprez and his works which are available on the website and provide an invaluable resource for anyone interested in delving into his films.

Sunday 15 August 2010

BOOK-SHELF - To Hell With Culture - Herbert Read


My most recent dose of Art Criticism was a collection of essays by the late Herbert Read an anarchist and fervent supporter of the avant garde during the 1930's. Covering a wide range of topics from the inability of Democracy to be wholly integrated within the Capitalist superpowers of the West, to the role of pornography within art, Read consistently returns to one aim: to both define the role of Art and the artist within society.

Read at once challenges all forms of authority whether "democratic" or totalitarian and calls for liberty and a whole hearted pursuit of the arts which he defines as anything created with aesthetics and function in mind with a clear Ruskinian ideology at the heart of his writing.

Written shortly after an intense period of political turmoil, his work is all the more relevant to our own economic and political crisis in which the role of art and the artist is yet to be determined. Many of his warnings against a dogged pursuit of economic gain eerily stand, as a warning not heeded.

All in all Read's clarity of expression and literary flare, remind one not only to question one's own existence and the forces that govern it, but also maintain an air of optimism in humanity's ability to progress and combat adversity through a pursuit of the arts and an unconscious universal aestheticism in order to strive for better standard of living.